TanQuantTBVStart backtest →
USA CTVSee the strategy USA TBV (compounding turtle)Now viewing
USA TBVTurtle Breakout Vault· compounding turtle
TurtleBreakoutVault

Why this name? The legendary Turtle system trades the channel Breakoutto catch the trend, and its profits go to the Vault— sealed and compounded. Those three words are the whole strategy. "Ride the breakout, stack it in the vault."

Trading strategy · When the top of the HH/LL channel sees a Breakout, enter → defend risk with the ATR stop → profits are stored in the vault, then re-invested on a crash → as long as the trend runs, it is an endless compounding loop. Rooted in Wall Street legend Richard Dennis's 'Turtle' system.

The Origin · 1983 · Chicago

Are traders born,
or can they be taught?

Chicago, 1983. Legendary trader Richard Dennismade a bet with his partner. To prove his answer he placed a newspaper ad — ordinary people with no trading experiencewanted.

Dennis taught the recruits his rules for just two weeks and then handed them his own moneyto trade. Named after a turtle farm in Singapore, people called them “the Turtles”. The results settled the bet.

Richard Dennis
Richard Dennis
Creator of turtle trading · launched the 1983 'Turtle experiment'
Jerry Parker
Jerry Parker
The most successful Turtle · founder of Chesapeake Capital
~5 years
following the rules
$175M
earned by the Turtles
35y+
Parker still runs the same rules · 90+ markets

In about five years those ordinary beginners earned $175 million, proving Dennis right. The most successful Turtle, Jerry Parker, founded Chesapeake Capitalin 1988 and still runs 35+ years of the same rules across 90+ markets.

The secret was not genius —
it was the discipline to follow rules.
1983  →  2026

But it was a different era.

When Richard Dennis and Jerry Parker made their fortunes, original turtle trading lived in the 1980s–1990s— not today's 21st-century market. The markets, the assets, the era, the financial system have all changed. TanQuant keeps the turtle system itself, but fits it to the 21st century's upward structure.

Commodity futuresCurrency futuresBond futures1980s

Different markets, assets and era.
So we did not copy the legend as-is .

TanQuant · reinterpreted

Nasdaq turtle compounding trading.

At TanQuant, backed by extensive backtesting, we reinterpreted turtle trading for the Nasdaq's upward structure. It inherits the proven turtle discipline (trend-following, rule-based) while being optimized for the Nasdaq (QQQ · Nasdaq-100)and run on compound interest. And to remove humanity's one weakness — 'emotion'— the strategy is automated by AIand executed by the rules 24/7.

TREND

Rule-based trend following

Enter on channel breakouts, exit when the trend bends. Rules, not gut feeling.

COMPOUND

Compounding · vault structure

Part of every realized profit is set aside in the vault, then re-deployed in declines to grow the compounding.

AI · 24/7

Emotionless automatic execution

No room for fear or greed — the AI executes the rules 24/7 exactly as written.

QQQ · Nasdaq-100 ETF · real 2020 daily candles$145$189$233$277$3212020-012020-052020-092020-12▲ Buy · 2020-04-14$205.41 · 20-day high breakout▼ Sell · 2020-10-28$264.21 · 20-day low breakdown이 한 번의 거래 +28.6%
On real QQQ daily candles: ▲ buy (20-day high breakout)▼ sell (20-day low breakdown). This is how turtle rules behave on a real chart.
Real QQQ·NDX·TQQQ daily data · verified by the same code

The turtle rides the trend and
its profits are stacked in the vault automatically.

HHLL (turtle) channel trend following + infinite-compounding vault. Every chart in this handbook runs the trading engine on the backtester's built-in real QQQ daily candles— these are not made-up illustrations.

QQQ · 2020 daily · 20/20$147$190$233$277$3202020-012020-052020-092020-12Entry $205.4120-day high breakoutExit $264.2120-day low breakdown단일 롱 +28.6%
Real QQQ 2020 — entered on the $205.41 20-day-high breakout → exited at $264.21 on the 20-day-low breakdown. One long, +28.6%.
STEP 1 · leverage
+28.6% → +50%↑
a 1× single long +28.6%Amplify with 3× leverageand it clears +50%.
STEP 2 · realize profit
+$5,000↑
Seed $10,000 as the base, +50% or more means a profit of +$5,000 or more.
STEP 3 · store
cash vault +$500↑
of the profit ( 10%(+$500↑) automatically goes into the cash vault.

▲ The chart's Single long +28.6%converted to a real with 3× leverage— every time profit lands, 10% of the proceedsis stored in the vault automatically.

3× leverage · past backtests do not guarantee future returns · total loss possible (QQQ 3× measured MDD −92.7%)

What — the method

Turtle + the infinite-compounding vault.

Two parts, one system.

① Turtle · trend following

When price closes above the 20-day (default) high, buy; when it closes below the 20-day low, exit. Ignore the ripples and hunt one big trend.

② Infinite-compounding vault

Part of every realized profit is Cash vaultset aside — and when a crash comes, that cash is re-deployed at the bottomto grow the compounding.

Total equity = trading account + unrealized P&L + profit vaultThe trading pocket and the vault are physically separated — vault cash is preserved through crashes.
Rule 1 — entry

When the 20-day high breaks on a close, buy.

When price closes above the the prior 20-day high (upper channel)Enter when the close breaks it. Below: the real QQQ 2020 breakout at $205.41 as it recovered from the COVID crash.

QQQ · Feb–Jun 2020 · the entry$153$176$200$224$2472020-022020-032020-042020-06Entry $205.41 · 2020-04-14Close breaks the 20-day high (green line)
Real QQQ · the close broke the 20-day high (green line)and the entry fired (2020-04-14, $205.41).
Position size = max(trading pocket, 0) × Leverage ÷ entry close e.g. pocket $10,000 × leverage 3 ÷ $205.41 = ~146 shares ($30,000 exposure)
Rule 2 — exits (three)

You leave on whichever hits first.

Channel exit
when it closes below the 20-day low— close breaks below it and you exit (trend bent). Usually a profit-taking exit.
ATR stop
entry − multiple × ATR — fall below and you are stopped out (see the stop section).
Leverage liquidation line
fill floor on gap-downs entry × (1 − 1/leverage). Caps losses beyond margin.
QQQ · 2020 daily · 20/20$147$190$233$277$3202020-012020-052020-092020-12Entry $205.4120-day high breakoutExit $264.2120-day low breakdown단일 롱 +28.6%2×ATR stop ≈ $196entry − 2ATR · never hit as the trend ran
Real QQQ 2020 — entered $205.41 → held the rise (green zone) → 20-day low breakdownexited $264.21. One long, +28.6%.
Setting — HHLL channel

Two numbers = entry days / exit days.

The shorter the exit window, the faster it bails on small dips. Below is the exact same QQQ 1999–2000 stretchwith only the preset changed — entries ▲, exits ▼, holding zones (green shade).

S1 · 20/10$36$54$72$90$1081999-061999-092000-012000-05BuySellBuySellBuySellBuySellBuySell
S1 · 20/1010-day exit → 5 trades, 2 losses · chopped uptotal +17.1%
S2 · 20/20$36$54$72$90$1081999-061999-092000-012000-05BuySellBuySell
S2 · 20/20 (default)one entry, whole move · balanced+47.1%
S3 · 55/20$36$54$72$90$1081999-061999-092000-012000-05BuySellBuySell
S3 · 55/2055-day high enters late (9/3) · big moves only+40.5%
PresetEntry / exitThis stretchCharacter
S1 · 20/1020d / 10dtotal +17.1% (2 losses)sensitive · chopped by whipsaws
S2 · 20/20 (default)20d / 20d+47.1%balanced · rides the whole trend
S3 · 55/2055d / 20d+40.5%slow · late, big moves only
Summary — entries are similar; exit speedis what differs. Hate churn? Go long (20/20·55/20). Need fast escapes? Go short (20/10).
Rule 2-② — ATR stop

Stop = entry − multiple × ATR.

ATR (20-day range)sets the stop. Default multiple 2 → stop = entry − 2×ATR. Volatile assets get wider stops, calm ones tighter.

QQQ · 2000 daily · ATR stop$50$60$71$81$912000-062000-082000-102000-11Entry $83.56Stop $77.93 = entry − 2N (2×$2.82)EntryStopped at $77.93−6.7% · out before the big crash
Real QQQ — entered $83.56, ATR $2.82 → stop $77.93(= entry − 2×$2.82). Price touched the stop, cut at −6.7%, and the dot-com collapse that followed was avoided.
Key — the stop is a device that pays small losses to prevent big ones . But at high leverage, consecutive stops can stack into a deep drawdown (MDD).
Reality Check — Honest Limitations

The turtle No, it does not guarantee profits.

Trend following is not almighty. where the turtle is weak, and why it still wins over the long run — the marks on the two charts below Buy·Sellare not decorations: they sit exactly where the real turtle rules fired in backtest.

Buy · 20-day high breakout Sell · HHLL exit (20-day low breakdown) Sell · 2ATR stop (entry − 2ATR)

① The 2008 crisis — it defends, but not perfectly

When the trend was alive it entered on a 20-day-high breakout ($46), and when the trend bent through the 20-day low it exited near $47. After that, the −43% collapse to $26 produced no entry signal at all — sat out entirely in cash — the stops and exits are the shield.

QQQ · 2008–09 daily · financial crisis (reproduced from the real trend)HHLL 20/20 · 2ATR$23$31$39$46$542008-012008-052008-102009-02BuySellHHLL exitBuySell2ATR stopin cash after the exit — crash avoidednot holding through the −40% leg

Buy= entry on a 20-day-high close breakout, Sell= HHLL exit or 2ATR stop. The crash leg had no breakouts, so no entries (cash). One re-entry near the bottom ended as a 2ATR stop at −4%— so not perfect.

Key — The turtle It avoids the body of big crashes(defense). But it cannot block everything — small stops on false bottoms remain as a cost.

② Sideways markets — the turtle's true weakness

The turtle It suffers more in chop than in declines. In a box range, every false breakoutthat pokes past the channel gets bought, Entrythen soon hits entry − 2ATRand gets Stop lossstopped out — again and again.

QQQ · sideways stretch, daily (reproduced from the real trend)HHLL 20/20 · 2ATR$100$104$109$113$1171mo3mo6mo9moBuySell2ATR stopBuySell2ATR stopBuySell2ATR stopBuySell2ATR stopBuySell2ATR stoplong chop → consecutive stopsentered and stopped on every false breakout

Within one box range, breakout entries2ATR stoprepeated five times in a row (−2 to −4% each). With no trend there is no big win to claw it back — the turtle's worst environment.

Weakness — long chop brings the turtle consecutive stops. A strategy built to catch one big trend finds a market with no trend at allits greatest enemy.

③ And yet — time is on the turtle's side

There were losing years, no question. But on a multi-decade clock the Nasdaq trended up— through the dot-com bust (−83%) and the financial crisis (−53%) it kept printing new highs. From ~250 in 1985 to ~26,000 in 2026 — roughly 100× in 40 years.

Nasdaq Composite (IXIC) · 1985–2026 · log scalemonth-end closes3001,0003,00010,00030,0001985199520002008201520212026Dot-com bustFinancial crisisCOVID1985 · ~2502026 · near all-time highs ~26,000Through two great crashes — about 100× ↑$250 → $26,000 · up and to the right

Nasdaq Composite 1985–2026 (log scale). The dot-com, 2008 and COVID crashes are all there, yet the big direction never changed. The small losses of chop were one big trendmore than repaid, and executing these rules automatically, without emotionconverged to long-run profit in backtests.

Losses are local

The weak stretches concentrate in chop and frequent reversals. Stops shave you thin, but fatal wounds are avoided.

Profits cluster in trends

A handful of big trendsrepay years of small losses at once. Never missing those trends is the turtle's essence.

To prepare for those losses, the TanQuant turtleadds a "profit storage system"that stabilizes it beyond the original turtle. → Which makes the next chapter's principle simple — set some aside when you earn, put it back in when it falls.
Engine — the vault (store · re-invest)

Earn → set aside, fall → put back in.

store — when a channel exit lands a profit, the more total equity has grown vs. the baseline, +50/+100/+150/+200% the larger the share stored in the vault (store 10% → ×1.0/1.5/1.8/2.0 = 10/15/18/20%). Re-invest — when total equity falls trigger-% from its peak (default −30%) and the vault holds cash, part of the vault is re-deployed at the bottom.

Total equity (pocket + unrealized + vault)Vault balance (cash set aside)$13k$38k$63k$89k2017-062019-032020-122022-092024-06stored +$2,137stored +$4,118re-invested −$4,299re-invested −$2,149stored +$5,708
Real QQQ (3× leverage) 2017–2024 — the rally filled the vault with stores (+$2,137 · +$4,118), and the 2022 decline fired re-investments (−$4,299 · −$2,149)before the recovery.
Setting — re-entry ratio

Re-entry ratio = % of the remaining cash.

The most misread value. Not the whole vault — only that % of what remains goes in.

Vault $1,000 · re-entry 50% → this time $500 deployed, $500kept for the next crash

Below is the real dot-com crash (2000–2003)— a vault filled to $1,735 by exits, deploying half of its remaining cash at every −30% crash.

Vault balance (50% of remaining cash per crash)$1,735right after storing−$868$868after 1st deploy−$434$434after 2nd−$217$217after 3rd−$108$108after 4th−$54$54after 5thHalf of what remains each time → even a long crash never empties the vault at once
Measured — vault $1,735 → 50% per crash: $868 → $434 → $217 → $108 → $54 … never emptied in one go — split.
A lower ratio splits finer and lasts longer (conservative); a higher one deploys hard at once (aggressive).
How it works — in practice

How storing and re-investing actually move in the wild.

Instead of listing settings, one chart: QQQ 3× leverage · the measured 2017–2024 flow . Points ①–⑤ on the left map straight to the steps on the right — the vault fills in rallies (store) and deploys at the bottom in crashes (re-invest).

Price (QQQ 3× · cycle example) · rally = red / decline = blue$120$160$200$2401Rally2Peak3Crash4Bottom5RecoveryVault balance — stores in rallies ↑ · re-invests in crashes ↓RallyCrash · re-investRecovery
1
Rally · storing on exits store 10%

Every channel exit sets aside part of total equity in the 10%Amplify profit vault. Measured across the rally, +$2,137 · +$4,118accumulated.

2
Peak · vault charged vault $1,735

By the rally's end the cash set aside reached $1,735. It is physically separated from the trading accountso a crash cannot take it.

3
Crash · re-entry trigger trigger −30%

When total equity falls −30% from its peak, re-entry fires. Shallow (−20%) fires often; deep (−50%) only on big crashes.

4
Bottom · re-entry ratio ratio 50%

Deploys 50%of the remaining vault each time: $1,735→868→434… as measured, −$4,299 · −$2,149was re-invested at the bottom.

5
Recovery · compounding accelerates more shares

Cheaper prices at the bottom mean more shares → in the rebound compounding accelerates. The vault refills, ready for the next cycle.

Key — storecollects cash in rallies, Triggertimes the crash, the ratiosplits the deployment. The three settings interlock and infinite-compounding vaultthe cycle turns. Every value can be adjusted on screen and backtested instantly.
Design Yours

There is no single answer.
You design it yourself.

This is TanQuant's real strength. We do not force an answer. From stop width to re-entry ratio, you adjust everythingand run on backtest instantly— and find your own data-verified values.

STRATEGY STUDIOExample · adjust it yourself
Move the sliders. Every value is yours to change.
ATR stop multiple — stop width2.0×
HHLL channel — entry/exit sensitivity20 / 20
Store — share of exits set aside10%
Re-entry trigger — from peak−30%
Re-entry ratio — of remaining cash50%
Leverage — optional2.0×
SAME STRATEGY · DIFFERENT SETTINGS
Same strategy, different settings → different results. (QQQ 1999–2026 measured)
Conservative lev 1× · store 12% · trigger −20%+346%
Max drawdown −62%
86 trades · 42 wins
Balanced lev 2× · store 10% · trigger −30%+1,051%
Max drawdown −83%
86 trades · 42 wins
Aggressive lev 3× · store 5% · trigger −40%+2,033%
Max drawdown −94%
86 trades · 42 wins

The more aggressive, the bigger both the returns and the drawdowns. Which balance to strike is up to you.

Every setting shown so far is just a default example, not a fixed answer. Adjust ATR, HHLL, storing, the re-entry trigger and ratio yourself, backtest instantly, and find your own values you can trust with data. Leverage too is a free choice between 1–3×.

Design Yours · Start Now

You have read the legend.
Now it is time to design your strategy.

From Richard Dennis's turtle to TanQuant's infinite-compounding vault — every rule and setting is yours to adjust and backtest instantly.

Past backtests do not guarantee future returns; leveraged products can lose your entire principal. This is not investment advice — all decisions and responsibility are your own. · © TanQuant